The petitioner sought the cancellation of a young for putting in h2o source on lands allegedly belonging to him and his forefathers. The court docket emphasised the need for that petitioner to obtain locus standi being an “aggrieved human being” in constitutional jurisdiction circumstances. In cases like this, the dispute https://illegal-encroachments-law04915.newsbloger.com/31520244/the-smart-trick-of-land-ownership-and-title-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-that-nobody-is-discussing